Home › Forums › Proposal Agreement Seeking › Proposal 008-16: Appointment of Interim State Co-chair
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 16, 2016 at 1:00 pm #1465
Greg Marsh
MemberAbstain.
November 16, 2016 at 8:15 pm #1466Harry Hempy
MemberThere is a process problem with this proposal.Logically, voting cannot begin until Council has agreed to appoint an interim state co-chair and hold an election (this proposal).Council should have a week for Agreement seeking, ending 11/22, before voting starts.
November 17, 2016 at 3:30 am #1467Brittany Hoover
MemberHarry, agreement was met when nominations were made during the last few weeks in a separate section of the forum. I'm not sure what the problem is.
November 17, 2016 at 6:32 am #1468Nancy York
MemberPosted by Nancy York1. Bell2. Worthy3. Menconi
November 17, 2016 at 4:06 pm #1469Larry Dunn
Member1. Dave Bell2. Arn Menconi3. Robert Lee Worthey
November 17, 2016 at 10:59 pm #1470GortonA
Member1. Arn Menconi.
November 17, 2016 at 11:40 pm #1471Bill Bartlett
Member1. Menconi2. WortheyCan't cast a vote for the third, despite the nice words I've seen the side of Bell that doesn't reflect positive leadership qualities. Menconi has many years of experience that would help grow our party, and has shown undeniable tenacity and willingness to lead!
November 18, 2016 at 12:25 am #1472kcterry
Member1. Bell2. Worthey3. Menconi
November 18, 2016 at 1:53 am #1473Joseph Scardetta
Member1. Dave Bell2. Arn Menconi3. Robert Lee Worthey
November 18, 2016 at 3:19 am #1474John Wontrobski
Member1. Menconi 2. Worthey 3. BellJohn WontrobskiSan Miguel Greens
November 18, 2016 at 4:11 pm #1475Michael Haughey
Member1. Menconi2. WortheyMichael HaugheyJefferson County Green Party
November 18, 2016 at 9:04 pm #1476judyh
Member1. Dave Bell2. Robert Lee WortheyWe failed to reach a consensus on whether to list a third choice for the position.Judy HarringtonCo-chair, Poudre Valley Greens
November 18, 2016 at 10:09 pm #1477Chris Allen
Member1) Bell2)Menconi3) Worthey
November 18, 2016 at 11:07 pm #1478Brianna Friend
MemberDavid Bell
November 19, 2016 at 12:15 am #1479Harry Hempy
MemberHarry, agreement was met when nominations were made during the last few weeks in a separate section of the forum. I'm not sure what the problem is.
I see no evidence that agreement was met to appoint an interim state co-chair.The topic "Call for Co Chair Nominations" started by the GPCO Secretary on October 4, 2016 on the Private Council Discussion board says, in part, "I'd like to invite nominations for the position of interim state party co-chair, to serve the remainder of the two-year term."The problem is that, per section 5.8 of the bylaws, the state secretary does not have authority to start an appointment process (including calling for nominations) to fill a vacant co-chair position, unilaterally. In fact, the state chair and secretary, acting together, do not have authority to decide to fill a vacant co-chair position. The decision about whether to fill a vacant co-chair position with an interim appointment is reserved for GPCO Council.The call for nominations cannot be considered to be a Council agreement, first, because it was done in private and did not use Council's agreement seeking process. Secondly, even if Council thought of the call for nominations as a proposal to be agreed on, in spite of using a hidden board and not using the standard proposal format, agreement could not have been reached because only 4 chapters responded.That is why this proposal, 008-16, to appoint an interim state co-chair needs to go through agreement seeking.Voting for co-chair makes no sense until Council has agreed to fill the position.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
