Proposal 008-16: Appointment of Interim State Co-chair

Home Forums Proposal Agreement Seeking Proposal 008-16: Appointment of Interim State Co-chair

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 61 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1465
    Greg Marsh
    Member

    Abstain.

    #1466
    Harry Hempy
    Member

    There is a process problem with this proposal.Logically, voting cannot begin until Council has agreed to appoint an interim state co-chair and hold an election (this proposal).Council should have a week for Agreement seeking, ending 11/22, before voting starts.

    #1467

    Harry, agreement was met when nominations were made during the last few weeks in a separate section of the forum. I'm not sure what the problem is.

    #1468
    Nancy York
    Member

    Posted by Nancy York1. Bell2. Worthy3. Menconi

    #1469
    Larry Dunn
    Member

    1. Dave Bell2. Arn Menconi3. Robert Lee Worthey

    #1470
    GortonA
    Member

    1. Arn Menconi.

    #1471

    1. Menconi2. WortheyCan't cast a vote for the third, despite the nice words I've seen the side of Bell that doesn't reflect positive leadership qualities. Menconi has many years of experience that would help grow our party, and has shown undeniable tenacity and willingness to lead!

    #1472
    kcterry
    Member

    1. Bell2. Worthey3. Menconi

    #1473

    1. Dave Bell2. Arn Menconi3. Robert Lee Worthey

    #1474

    1. Menconi 2. Worthey 3. BellJohn WontrobskiSan Miguel Greens

    #1475

    1.  Menconi2.  WortheyMichael HaugheyJefferson County Green Party

    #1476
    judyh
    Member

    1. Dave Bell2. Robert Lee WortheyWe failed to reach a consensus on whether to list a third choice for the position.Judy HarringtonCo-chair, Poudre Valley Greens

    #1477
    Chris Allen
    Member

    1) Bell2)Menconi3) Worthey

    #1478

    David Bell

    #1479
    Harry Hempy
    Member

    Harry, agreement was met when nominations were made during the last few weeks in a separate section of the forum. I'm not sure what the problem is.

    I see no evidence that agreement was met to appoint an interim state co-chair.The topic "Call for Co Chair Nominations" started by the GPCO Secretary on October 4, 2016 on the Private Council Discussion board says, in part, "I'd like to invite nominations for the position of interim state party co-chair, to serve the remainder of the two-year term."The problem is that, per section 5.8 of the bylaws, the state secretary does not have authority to start an appointment process (including calling for nominations) to fill a vacant co-chair position, unilaterally. In fact, the state chair and secretary, acting together, do not have authority to decide to fill a vacant co-chair position. The decision about whether to fill a vacant co-chair position with an interim appointment is reserved for GPCO Council.The call for nominations cannot be considered to be a Council agreement, first, because it was done in private and did not use Council's agreement seeking process. Secondly, even if Council thought of the call for nominations as a proposal to be agreed on, in spite of using a hidden board and not using the standard proposal format, agreement could not have been reached because only 4 chapters responded.That is why this proposal, 008-16, to appoint an interim state co-chair needs to go through agreement seeking.Voting for co-chair makes no sense until Council has agreed to fill the position.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 61 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.