Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Harry, agreement was met when nominations were made during the last few weeks in a separate section of the forum. I'm not sure what the problem is.
I recently found out that since I am a state officer, I'm technically allowed to vote. I typically abstain from voting to remain neutral as facilitator, but wanted to take an opportunity to vote at least once.Dave Bell, I love your goals for the party and gladly cast my vote for you.
The voting period has ended and the proposal has failed. Thank you to everyone who sent me updated chapter council members and their contact info! If you haven't already, please email me with which chapter you represent and your email address so that I can add it to my record. My email is Brittany.HooverATC@gmail.com. I will post the official voting record shortly.
Ok, for the last time. This proposal has been BLOCKED. I will be locking it to keep people from continuously voting here. If you want your vote to count, it must be cast in the proposal under council voting linked here: http://gpco.fullydefiant.com/forum/index.php?topic=299.15
Bob, Apologies, I haven't been getting emails that people have been replying on this. Agreement seeking has ended, so there was no need to block the proposal. It's no longer an active proposal so voting is no longer open. Sorry for the confusion.
Sean, when I asked for clarification when posting this proposal by the sponsors, I was told it is not a recall proposal, which is why I didn't reference Section 5.9 of the Bylaws. I referenced 4.3 because, since this is not a recall proposal, it was the next best fit. Any other clarification will have to come from the sponsors of the proposal. If you think you can do a better job as facilitator, be my guest.
Jonathan, Can you go vote “no” then on the proposal in council voting? “Agreement seeking” has ended because it was already blocked.
Joseph, If you can upload them to your post with an attachment, that would probably be best, but lets move the conversation over to the proposal voting forum where the votes should be cast.
The proposal has been blocked and will be moving over to the Council vote as soon as I can move it. Joseph, please be ready to back your claim that this proposal is motivated by race. I do my best to remain as neutral as possible as council facilitator but that accusation seems outlandish. Let's keep this professional and on topic.
Four chapters have voted. An additional 3 are needed to reach Quorum. I realize that this is a sensitive topic, but the lack of response by so many chapters is concerning. If you disagree, block the proposal. If you wish to remain neutral, vote stand aside. A lack of willingness to address leadership issues within the party sets a dangerous precedent. The council can't just ignore this and hope it goes away. It will tear this state party apart. Regardless of your stance, it needs to be addressed.
Apologies for my late response, but this proposal has met quorum and passed within the agreement seeking time frame.
Scott Lupo and Dustin Fiortinez, can you let me know what chapters you represent? You can reply here or email me at Brittany.HooverATC@gmail.com. Thanks!
Sean,In regards to you stating you did not realize you were breaking protocol and that other proposals were not posted by me: one, as I stated in my e-mail to you, Andrea asked me if she could post in my place because I couldn't do it in an appropriate time frame. She asked before she posted. Bill also posted a proposal in the forum and immediately sent out an email to me, and CC'ed to you, Andrea, and Tom dated September 4th and stating the following:
Hi Brittany,When I posted my last proposal, I realized that the chairs have broken protocol when it comes to proposals.Brittany, the Facilitator, is supposed to receive them and fill out that top portion (referencing the Bylaws and quorum). Then she posts the completed version to the forum for the council to make their vote.Any members may submit a proposal to the Facilitator. They don't have to go to Council Discussion first. Council Discussion is a place to clean up and fill out a proposal with the group before Agreement Seeking. The Facilitator is the officer that posts the Proposals for voting.The Facilitator works with the State Secretary to verify the voting council members from active chapters, as missing too many votes will cause a chapter to fall inactive.First, sorry for my part in that broken protocol. I got used to be being an Interim Facilitator.And second, would you mind checking my list and making sure of my active chapter list?http://gpco.fullydefiant.com/forum/index.php?topic=285.0I'll post this as a bare-bones proposal template so our officers have a reminder of how to create and submit proposals.
So in regards to you not knowing you broke protocol, if you were reading your email, you should have known. I'm not sure why you're even bringing this up in the forum when I discussed it privately via email? It's no longer relevant.
